NZ: Is The New Zealand Government really tyrannical ?
Is The New Zealand Government really tyrannical ?
I was very interested to read the following article that I found lately while just surfing around on the net.
The following article was published in The Washington Times on 29/09/2000
Paul Craig Roberts identifies the relationship between our universities ???politically correct?????? And those of previous ideologies. He is right on target. His article appeared in The Washington Times (September 29, 2000).
"Tyranny is creeping up on us. If you don???t believe it, consider the most prominent hallmarks of the Nazi and communist regimes, which sought to supplant democracy in the 20th century.
"In National Socialist Germany and the Soviet Union, there were no First Amendment rights. No one could voice an opinion contrary to the politically correct views enforced by the Gestapo and the KGB. Media and education were used to instill politically correct thinking and bring denunciation upon anyone who departed from politically correct thinking.
"This is precisely the situation that exists today in the vast majority of American colleges and universities. Verbal and facial expressions that are contrary to political correctness result in sensitivity training (a form of brainwashing) or expulsion for the offender, who may have done nothing more than laugh. If the source of mirth is an ethnic joke, a blonde joke or a hilarious claim by a multiculturalist, the hapless offender discovers that his constitutional protections do not exist.
"In Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, there were victim groups that were championed and oppressor groups that were suppressed. In Germany, the ???victims??? were Aryans, who were said to be under the financial hegemony of Jews. In the Soviet Union, the hegemonic group was the bourgeoisie, who allegedly held sway over an oppressed proletariat. In both countries, victims were permitted to exercise violent language and actions against oppressors.
"In the United States today, white heterosexual able-bodied males constitute the hegemonic group. Everyone else is a member of a victim group.
"In Germany and the Soviet Union, the abstract and imaginary group roles of oppressor and victim were given a frightful reality by ideologues. Race and class categories became the basis for discrimination and new legal systems that favored victims??? groups with preferences.
"On American campuses, multi-cultural ideology has revived the concepts of race and class oppression, and added new ones based on gender and sexual orientation. Men oppress women, and heterosexuals oppress homosexuals.
"According to multiculturalists, our culture and values reflect nothing but the arbitrary domination of society by white heterosexual males. University of Pennsylvania professor Alan Kors says that, thanks to multiculturalism, ???half a century after the defeat of Nazism, we distinguish by blood and we equate blood with culture.??? We now think like Nazis and explain our society and culture in terms of race (and gender) hegemony.
"Tyrannical states attack the family. Both the Nazis and communists are infamous for state intrusions in family affairs. In the United States, similar bureaucratic and political intrusions come from family courts. Most Americans are unaware of the existence of these relatively new ???courts.??? Howard University Professor Stephen Baskerville is the leading authority on these courts. He says family courts are ???the most dangerous institutions posing a threat to constitutional rights in our society. The only parallels are the ideological-bureaucratic dictatorships of the last century.???
"Family courts claim immunity from the Constitution and from scrutiny by federal courts. Mr. Baskerville describes them as follows: ???their proceedings are secret and unrecorded. Their orders are enforced by bureaucratic police who do not wear uniforms and whose sole responsibility is to conduct surveillance over families and private lives. As such, these police are akin to secret police. By the very nature of their jurisdiction, these courts and police are the most intrusive and invasive arm of government, and yet they are accountable to virtually no one. Such an institution is intolerable in a free society.???
"Recently a family court judge ordered the parents of a 7-year-old boy in Berne, N.Y., to put their child on Ritalin, a behavior-control drug. The alternative was to be found guilty of ???educational neglect,??? an offense that would open the possibility of their child being seized by Child Protective Services ??? a Hillary Clinton ???village??? institution straight from the pages of the Gestapo. The child suffered serious side effects from the drug, but parents no longer have the right to decide what is best for their children. "Tyrannical states assault the individual in the inner recesses of his consciousness. He is not permitted to think certain thoughts or to express a prohibited thought privately to anyone. "Recently, Janice Barton encountered a Spanish-speaking couple while leaving a restaurant in Manistee, Mich. She turned to her mother and said, ???I wish these [ethnic slur] would learn to speak English.??? An off- duty deputy sheriff over-heard the private remark, followed the woman to her car and noted her tag number. Janice Barton was sentenced to 45 days in jail for her thought crime.
"This couldn???t happen in a free country."
----------------------------------------...
It has raised some very valid points, which needs to be discussed. It made me think of a few questions that I feel needs to be addressed.
Can & does the same sort of thing happen in New Zealand? If it does how wide spread is it?
How many lives and families are being destroyed by such a push by the New Zealand???s Government to bring about social change & equality by " FORCE " & " COERCION ????
What part do the many varied social groups (eg Women???s refuge etc) have in this process of change to our society?
What part does the Family Court and Justice system have to play in especially the matter of Family & Domestic violence, Child Abuse & in general the destruction of the family unit?
Just the thought of this sort of abuse of power in New Zealand by the people who are in position of power (eg MP???s, Judges, Police etc) is quite disgusting to say the least and should not be tolerated any longer.
You cannot bring about such changes by the misuse of power to control how people think & react with the use of FORCE & COERCION. In reality a big power struggle to which the strongest wins there is always a loser
Where is the equality that it trys so hard to obtain when they use power and control to bring it about?
I suggest to you that Equality in this sense doesn't in reality exist.
It all just seems to be people in these positions of power wanting to make up in their own twisted perception what they perceive is the best for everyone and then by whatever means available to then force people by the use of FORCE & COERCION to get what they want.
Is New Zealand going down this path to destruction?
I really hope that reading this doesn't destroy the rest of your day
Have a nice day :-)
Thanks
Pgbanews
END
|
